Britain Turns Aside Criticism About U.S. Treatment of Detainees
Amnesty International called their treatment "cruel, degrading and inhumane" and said, "Degrading treatment of prisoners is a flagrant violation of international law which cannot be justified under any circumstances." Human Rights Watch stated, "The proposed cages are a scandal. The United States should not be transporting detainees to Cuba until it can provide decent shelter."
Both organizations disputed the decision announced by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Friday that the prisoners would be held as "unlawful combatants", a status that gives them less protection than the Geneva Convention affords prisoners of war. "The U.S. is placing these people in legal limbo," Amnesty said today. "They deny that they are prisoners of war (POWs) while at the same time failing to provide them with the most basic protections of any person deprived of their liberty."
Geoffrey Robertson, a prominent London rights lawyer, called Mr. Rumsfeld's finding "deplorable" and said the United States was abandoning the same Geneva Convention protections that had saved the lives of American prisoners in Korea and Vietnam. He urged Britain "to remind our U.S. allies that the conventions lay down that anyone captured in the course of such a conflict must be presumed to have POW status until a competent court — not Donald Rumsfeld — declares otherwise."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/15/international/15CND-BRITAIN.html
Wednesday, December 05, 2001
A New Health Plan May Raise Expenses for Sickest Workers
…Deborah Chollet, an economist at Mathematica, a nonprofit research concern, said the new plans could be a barrier to needed care for some people. The plans would leave families essentially without insurance until they have spent several thousand dollars, she said. "Uninsured people don't consume much care" because they may have difficulty deciding whether care is necessary or not, she said.
"This is taking coverage away from people," said Ms. Chollet, a health insurance specialist. "And it is obviously a greater hardship for the lower-income workers."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/05/business/05CARE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
…Deborah Chollet, an economist at Mathematica, a nonprofit research concern, said the new plans could be a barrier to needed care for some people. The plans would leave families essentially without insurance until they have spent several thousand dollars, she said. "Uninsured people don't consume much care" because they may have difficulty deciding whether care is necessary or not, she said.
"This is taking coverage away from people," said Ms. Chollet, a health insurance specialist. "And it is obviously a greater hardship for the lower-income workers."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/05/business/05CARE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Groups Protest Bush's Freezing of Foundation's Assets
"This action is really creating outrage in the Muslim community," said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American Islamic Relations, one of the groups. "The holy foundation has a long history of being a respected Muslim charity that does good work, not only in Palestine, but other parts of the world."
The Bush administration accuses the foundation, based in Richardson, Tex., of funneling money to the radical Palestinian group Hamas, which has claimed responsibility for a string of suicide bombings in Israel. The foundation, which has been under scrutiny by the American government for at least five years, says the accusations are untrue.
"We have always denied that accusation, and the administration did not produce any qualitative evidence," said Shukri Abu-Baker, the foundation's chief executive. "The foundation is strictly a humanitarian organization, and we have never supported Hamas."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/05/international/middleeast/05HOLY.html
"This action is really creating outrage in the Muslim community," said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American Islamic Relations, one of the groups. "The holy foundation has a long history of being a respected Muslim charity that does good work, not only in Palestine, but other parts of the world."
The Bush administration accuses the foundation, based in Richardson, Tex., of funneling money to the radical Palestinian group Hamas, which has claimed responsibility for a string of suicide bombings in Israel. The foundation, which has been under scrutiny by the American government for at least five years, says the accusations are untrue.
"We have always denied that accusation, and the administration did not produce any qualitative evidence," said Shukri Abu-Baker, the foundation's chief executive. "The foundation is strictly a humanitarian organization, and we have never supported Hamas."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/05/international/middleeast/05HOLY.html
Monday, December 03, 2001
Demanding a Diagnosis, and Outwitting Anthrax
Though he did not know it on those days, Oct. 11, 12 and 13, Mr. Richmond was already sick. He had inhaled anthrax spores, postal officials later told him, most likely on the morning of the 11th, while cleaning near a contaminated mail-sorting machine. A medical odyssey that would shake him and his family to the core and help rewrite the book on anthrax — its complications, its treatment, its survivability — had begun. And no one knew.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/03/national/03LERO.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Though he did not know it on those days, Oct. 11, 12 and 13, Mr. Richmond was already sick. He had inhaled anthrax spores, postal officials later told him, most likely on the morning of the 11th, while cleaning near a contaminated mail-sorting machine. A medical odyssey that would shake him and his family to the core and help rewrite the book on anthrax — its complications, its treatment, its survivability — had begun. And no one knew.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/03/national/03LERO.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
News: Got hacked? Blame it on the software
There's only one problem with software development these days, according to security analyst and author Gary McGraw: It isn't any good.
McGraw, noted for his books on Java security, is out with a new book that purports to tell software developers how to do it better. Titled Building Secure Software and co-authored with technologist John Viega, the book provides a plan for designing software better able to resist the hacker attacks and worm infestations that plague the networked world.
At the root of the problem, McGraw argues, lies "bad software." While the market demands that software companies develop more features more quickly, McGraw and others in the security field are sounding the alarm that complex and hastily designed applications are sure to be shot through with security holes.
McGraw's top five software-security nightmares
1. Buffer overflow
An attacker floods a field, typically an address bar, with more characters than it can accommodate. The excess characters in some cases can be run as "executable" code, effectively giving the attacker control of the computer without being constrained by security measures.
2. Race condition
"The idea is that you have something that should be done in an atomic fashion, all at once, that is done instead in multiple steps, and an attacker can sneak in between the steps and change things."
3. Random number generation
"The problem is that computers are predictable. And predictability turns out to be a big problem for cryptography, because what you want for cryptographic keys is real randomness, not pseudo-randomness. That's a mistake that a lot of programmers make."
4. Misuse of cryptography
"A lot of programmers think they can roll their own algorithms. But it turns out that crypto is a highly sophisticated art, and you need to be trained to do it."
5. Trust problems
"Not validating input, or (putting too much trust in things) sending you a message. No. 5 also could be authentication; it's a toss-up."
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2829102,00.html
There's only one problem with software development these days, according to security analyst and author Gary McGraw: It isn't any good.
McGraw, noted for his books on Java security, is out with a new book that purports to tell software developers how to do it better. Titled Building Secure Software and co-authored with technologist John Viega, the book provides a plan for designing software better able to resist the hacker attacks and worm infestations that plague the networked world.
At the root of the problem, McGraw argues, lies "bad software." While the market demands that software companies develop more features more quickly, McGraw and others in the security field are sounding the alarm that complex and hastily designed applications are sure to be shot through with security holes.
McGraw's top five software-security nightmares
1. Buffer overflow
An attacker floods a field, typically an address bar, with more characters than it can accommodate. The excess characters in some cases can be run as "executable" code, effectively giving the attacker control of the computer without being constrained by security measures.
2. Race condition
"The idea is that you have something that should be done in an atomic fashion, all at once, that is done instead in multiple steps, and an attacker can sneak in between the steps and change things."
3. Random number generation
"The problem is that computers are predictable. And predictability turns out to be a big problem for cryptography, because what you want for cryptographic keys is real randomness, not pseudo-randomness. That's a mistake that a lot of programmers make."
4. Misuse of cryptography
"A lot of programmers think they can roll their own algorithms. But it turns out that crypto is a highly sophisticated art, and you need to be trained to do it."
5. Trust problems
"Not validating input, or (putting too much trust in things) sending you a message. No. 5 also could be authentication; it's a toss-up."
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2829102,00.html
Sunday, December 02, 2001
How Islam and Politics Mixed
Basically, this phenomenon involves the immoral, unscrupulous and irreligious exploitation of Islam as a political weapon — by everyone. The West, the United States, Arab and other Muslim tyrannies have all used the weapon of Islam. And all are paying their different prices for it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/opinion/02MEHI.html?todaysheadlines
Basically, this phenomenon involves the immoral, unscrupulous and irreligious exploitation of Islam as a political weapon — by everyone. The West, the United States, Arab and other Muslim tyrannies have all used the weapon of Islam. And all are paying their different prices for it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/opinion/02MEHI.html?todaysheadlines
African Artifacts Suggest an Earlier Modern Human
Until now, modern human behavior was widely assumed to have been a very late and abrupt development that seemed to have originated in a kind of "creative explosion" in Europe. The most spectacular evidence for it showed up after modern Homo sapiens arrived there from Africa about 40,000 years ago. Although there had been suggestions of an African genesis of modern behavior, no proof had turned up, certainly nothing comparable to the fine tools and cave art of Upper Paleolithic Europe.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/science/02BONE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Until now, modern human behavior was widely assumed to have been a very late and abrupt development that seemed to have originated in a kind of "creative explosion" in Europe. The most spectacular evidence for it showed up after modern Homo sapiens arrived there from Africa about 40,000 years ago. Although there had been suggestions of an African genesis of modern behavior, no proof had turned up, certainly nothing comparable to the fine tools and cave art of Upper Paleolithic Europe.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/science/02BONE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Tribunal Comparison Taints Courts-Martial, Military Lawyers Say
Former military lawyers say they are angered by a public perception, fed most recently by the top White House lawyer, that the military tribunals authorized by President Bush are merely wartime versions of American courts-martial, a routine part of military life with a longstanding reputation for openness and procedural fairness.
In fact, the proposed tribunals are significantly different from courts- martial, the lawyers say, adding that confusion between the two has distorted the debate over the tribunals and unfairly denigrated military justice.
"It bothers me that people are thinking we try thousands of people this way in the courts-martial system," said Ronald W. Meister, a New York lawyer who is a former Navy lawyer and judge.
"We do nothing of the sort," he said. "These commissions are a totally different animal."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/national/02TRIB.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Former military lawyers say they are angered by a public perception, fed most recently by the top White House lawyer, that the military tribunals authorized by President Bush are merely wartime versions of American courts-martial, a routine part of military life with a longstanding reputation for openness and procedural fairness.
In fact, the proposed tribunals are significantly different from courts- martial, the lawyers say, adding that confusion between the two has distorted the debate over the tribunals and unfairly denigrated military justice.
"It bothers me that people are thinking we try thousands of people this way in the courts-martial system," said Ronald W. Meister, a New York lawyer who is a former Navy lawyer and judge.
"We do nothing of the sort," he said. "These commissions are a totally different animal."
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/02/national/02TRIB.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Saturday, December 01, 2001
Why is Attorney General Ashcroft using his office to punish this man so severely? At a time of national anxiety about Arabs and Muslims, Mr. Al-Najjar is a useful target: a Palestinian Muslim. More broadly, Mr. Ashcroft has claimed power to detain non-citizens even when immigration judges order them released.
It Can Happen Here
On the basis of secret evidence, the government accuses a non-citizen of connections to terrorism, and holds him in prison for three years. Then a judge conducts a full trial and rejects the terrorism charges. He releases the prisoner. A year later government agents rearrest the man, hold him in solitary confinement and state as facts the terrorism charges that the judge found untrue.
Could that happen in America? In John Ashcroft's America it has happened.
Mazen Al-Najjar, a Palestinian, came to the United States in 1984 as a graduate student and stayed to teach at a university. The Immigration Service moved to deport him for overstaying his visa — and asked an immigration judge, R. Kevin McHugh, to imprison him. Secret evidence, the government lawyers said, showed that Mr. Al-Najjar had raised funds for a terrorist organization, Palestinian Islamic Jihad. In June 1997 Judge McHugh issued the detention order.
Mr. Al-Najjar's lawyers went to federal court and challenged the use of secret evidence against him. The court held that he must at least be told enough about the evidence to have a fair chance of responding to it.
Judge McHugh then reopened the case in his immigration court. In a two-week trial the government's lead witness, an Immigration agent, admitted that there was no evidence of Mr. Al-Najjar contributing to a terrorist organization or ever advocating terrorism. At the end Judge McHugh found that there were no "bona fide reasons to conclude that [Mr. Al- Najjar] is a threat to national security."
Judge McHugh, a former U.S. marine, wrote a 56-page decision that evidently carried much legal weight. The Board of Immigration Appeals rejected a government appeal. And Attorney General Janet Reno, who had the right to step in, refused to do so. A year ago Mr. Al-Najjar rejoined his wife and three daughters.
Last Saturday immigration agents arrested Mr. Al-Najjar again. The Justice Department issued a triumphant press release saying that the case "underscores the department's commitment to address terrorism by using all legal authorities available." Mr. Al-Najjar, it said, "had established ties to terrorist organizations."
That flat, conclusory statement was in direct contradiction to the findings made by Judge McHugh after a full trial. And the department did not claim, this time, to be relying on undisclosed information. It said the detention was "not based on classified evidence."
Israel Tanks Surround West Bank Towns
The United States has asked Israel to stay out of Palestinian areas. Israeli tanks had just pulled out of Jenin last week, and the retaking of some areas came as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon visited the United States.
At sundown Saturday, Israeli tanks fired randomly toward the southern outskirts of Jenin and an adjacent refugee camp, Palestinian witnesses said.
A 19-year-old taxi passenger and an 11-year-old boy were killed by large-caliber bullets fired from tank-mounted machine guns, said Mohammed Abu Ghali, director of Jenin Hospital. Both victims suffered head wounds, he said. Witnesses said the boy was shot as he and other youngsters threw stones at soldiers.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Israel-Palestinians.html
The United States has asked Israel to stay out of Palestinian areas. Israeli tanks had just pulled out of Jenin last week, and the retaking of some areas came as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon visited the United States.
At sundown Saturday, Israeli tanks fired randomly toward the southern outskirts of Jenin and an adjacent refugee camp, Palestinian witnesses said.
A 19-year-old taxi passenger and an 11-year-old boy were killed by large-caliber bullets fired from tank-mounted machine guns, said Mohammed Abu Ghali, director of Jenin Hospital. Both victims suffered head wounds, he said. Witnesses said the boy was shot as he and other youngsters threw stones at soldiers.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Israel-Palestinians.html
Ashcroft Seeking to Free F.B.I. to Spy on Groups
The proposal would loosen one of the most fundamental restrictions on the conduct of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and would be another step by the Bush administration to modify civil-liberties protections as a means of defending the country against terrorists, the senior officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/national/01BURE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
The proposal would loosen one of the most fundamental restrictions on the conduct of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and would be another step by the Bush administration to modify civil-liberties protections as a means of defending the country against terrorists, the senior officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/01/national/01BURE.html?todaysheadlines&pagewanted=all
Groups Gird for Long Legal Fight on New Bush Anti-Terror Powers
Bill Goodman, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, said that his group, which grew out of legal efforts to defend civil rights protesters in the 1960's, is planning to challenge the executive order signed by President Bush on Nov. 13 allowing special military tribunals to try foreigners charged with terrorism. Mr. Goodman said he was discussing the possible challenge with lawyers representing some of those likely to face charges.
Mr. Bush's order, he said, has effectively suspended the writ of habeas corpus, a centuries-old legal procedure protecting citizens from being held illegally by the government. No president has the right to do that without the approval of Congress, the center's lawyers argue.
"My job is to defend the Constitution from its enemies," Mr. Goodman said. "Its main enemies right now are the Justice Department and the White House."
Bill Goodman, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York, said that his group, which grew out of legal efforts to defend civil rights protesters in the 1960's, is planning to challenge the executive order signed by President Bush on Nov. 13 allowing special military tribunals to try foreigners charged with terrorism. Mr. Goodman said he was discussing the possible challenge with lawyers representing some of those likely to face charges.
Mr. Bush's order, he said, has effectively suspended the writ of habeas corpus, a centuries-old legal procedure protecting citizens from being held illegally by the government. No president has the right to do that without the approval of Congress, the center's lawyers argue.
"My job is to defend the Constitution from its enemies," Mr. Goodman said. "Its main enemies right now are the Justice Department and the White House."
Friday, November 30, 2001
Wake Up, America
The order is described as if it is aimed only at Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. A former deputy attorney general, George J. Terwilliger III, said the masterminds of the Sept. 11 attacks "don't deserve constitutional protection."
But the Bush order covers all noncitizens, and there are about 20 million of them in the United States — immigrants working toward citizenship, visitors and the like. Not one or 100 or 1,000 but 20 million.
And the order is not directed only at those who mastermind or participate in acts of terrorism. In the vaguest terms, it covers such things as "harboring" anyone who has ever aided acts of terrorism that might have had "adverse effects" on the U.S. economy or foreign policy. Many onetime terrorists — Menachem Begin, Nelson Mandela, Gerry Adams — regarded at the time as adverse to U.S. interests, have been "harbored" by Americans.
Apologists have also argued that the Bush military tribunals will give defendants enough rights. A State Department spokeswoman, Jo-Anne Prokopowicz, said that they would have rights "similar to those" found in the Hague war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
To the contrary, Hague defendants like Slobodan Milosevic are entitled to public trials before independent judges, and to lawyers of their choice. The Bush military trials are to be in secret, before officers who are subordinate to officials bringing the charges; defendants will not be able to pick their own lawyers. And, unlike the Hague defendants, they may be executed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/30/opinion/30LEWI.html?todaysheadlines
The order is described as if it is aimed only at Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. A former deputy attorney general, George J. Terwilliger III, said the masterminds of the Sept. 11 attacks "don't deserve constitutional protection."
But the Bush order covers all noncitizens, and there are about 20 million of them in the United States — immigrants working toward citizenship, visitors and the like. Not one or 100 or 1,000 but 20 million.
And the order is not directed only at those who mastermind or participate in acts of terrorism. In the vaguest terms, it covers such things as "harboring" anyone who has ever aided acts of terrorism that might have had "adverse effects" on the U.S. economy or foreign policy. Many onetime terrorists — Menachem Begin, Nelson Mandela, Gerry Adams — regarded at the time as adverse to U.S. interests, have been "harbored" by Americans.
Apologists have also argued that the Bush military tribunals will give defendants enough rights. A State Department spokeswoman, Jo-Anne Prokopowicz, said that they would have rights "similar to those" found in the Hague war crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
To the contrary, Hague defendants like Slobodan Milosevic are entitled to public trials before independent judges, and to lawyers of their choice. The Bush military trials are to be in secret, before officers who are subordinate to officials bringing the charges; defendants will not be able to pick their own lawyers. And, unlike the Hague defendants, they may be executed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/30/opinion/30LEWI.html?todaysheadlines
Justices Revisit the Issue of Child Protection in the Age of Internet Pornography
Four years after the Supreme Court overturned the federal government's first effort to shield children from pornography on the Internet, the justices were back today to consider whether the government's second try could pass First Amendment muster.
Even more sharply than before, the central question is whether a body of law that evolved in the heyday of the neighborhood adult bookstore and movie theater suits the age of the Internet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/29/national/29PORN.html
Four years after the Supreme Court overturned the federal government's first effort to shield children from pornography on the Internet, the justices were back today to consider whether the government's second try could pass First Amendment muster.
Even more sharply than before, the central question is whether a body of law that evolved in the heyday of the neighborhood adult bookstore and movie theater suits the age of the Internet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/29/national/29PORN.html
News: DeCSS ban upheld by court
A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld an order that prohibits publishing or linking to DVD-cracking code--a decision with sweeping significance for free-speech rights and copyright protection on the Internet.
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5100096,00.html
A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld an order that prohibits publishing or linking to DVD-cracking code--a decision with sweeping significance for free-speech rights and copyright protection on the Internet.
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5100096,00.html
View from the Ground 09/27/2001; The View From The Ground - Police Stories
Boatwright was blind-sided. He had no warning the blow was coming. The officer said nothing prior to striking him. "He didn't say, 'I'm an officer.' He didn't say, 'Stop!' He didn't say anything."
Witnesses said that the officer's name is Andre Cuerton.
Boatwright passed out briefly. He lay face down on the concrete. His nose was broken. His two top front teeth were knocked out—driven through his upper lip.
"I sat up on the ground, trying to compose myself. Another plainclothes policeman said, 'Get your black ass up. Ain't shit wrong with you. Get your black ass up.' I rolled over and got on my knees. As I was getting up, he grabbed my arm and slammed me up against the wall."
This police officer took him to the paddy wagon where they were collecting dozens of people they had arrested. As far as Boatwright knows, he was the only one they roughed up.
http://www.viewfromtheground.com/index.cfm?vftg=31
Boatwright was blind-sided. He had no warning the blow was coming. The officer said nothing prior to striking him. "He didn't say, 'I'm an officer.' He didn't say, 'Stop!' He didn't say anything."
Witnesses said that the officer's name is Andre Cuerton.
Boatwright passed out briefly. He lay face down on the concrete. His nose was broken. His two top front teeth were knocked out—driven through his upper lip.
"I sat up on the ground, trying to compose myself. Another plainclothes policeman said, 'Get your black ass up. Ain't shit wrong with you. Get your black ass up.' I rolled over and got on my knees. As I was getting up, he grabbed my arm and slammed me up against the wall."
This police officer took him to the paddy wagon where they were collecting dozens of people they had arrested. As far as Boatwright knows, he was the only one they roughed up.
http://www.viewfromtheground.com/index.cfm?vftg=31
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
SearchDay - Twelve Cool Sites and Tools for Searchers - 21 November 2001
Twelve Cool Sites and Tools for Searchers
Create your own web image database, search for streaming multimedia,
automatically track changes to your favorite web pages -- check out the
dozen sites and tools covered in this roundup.
http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/01/sd1121-roundup.html
Twelve Cool Sites and Tools for Searchers
Create your own web image database, search for streaming multimedia,
automatically track changes to your favorite web pages -- check out the
dozen sites and tools covered in this roundup.
http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/01/sd1121-roundup.html
News: Search engines find the forbidden
Search-engine spiders crawling the Web are increasingly stumbling upon passwords, credit card numbers, classified documents and even computer vulnerabilities that can be exploited by hackers.
The problem is not new, security analysts say: Ever since search robots began indexing the Web years ago, Web site administrators have found pages not meant for public consumption exposed in search results.
But a new tool built into the Google search engine to find a variety of file types in addition to traditional Web documents is highlighting and in some cases exacerbating the problem. With Google's new file-type search tool, a wide array of files formerly overlooked by basic search engine queries are now just a few clicks from the average surfer--or the novice hacker.
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5099914,00.html
Search-engine spiders crawling the Web are increasingly stumbling upon passwords, credit card numbers, classified documents and even computer vulnerabilities that can be exploited by hackers.
The problem is not new, security analysts say: Ever since search robots began indexing the Web years ago, Web site administrators have found pages not meant for public consumption exposed in search results.
But a new tool built into the Google search engine to find a variety of file types in addition to traditional Web documents is highlighting and in some cases exacerbating the problem. With Google's new file-type search tool, a wide array of files formerly overlooked by basic search engine queries are now just a few clicks from the average surfer--or the novice hacker.
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5099914,00.html
Tuesday, November 27, 2001
A List Apart: Reading Design
An Entirely Incomplete List of Things a Non–Illiterate Designer Should Know Before Being a Designer:
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/readingdesign/
An Entirely Incomplete List of Things a Non–Illiterate Designer Should Know Before Being a Designer:
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/readingdesign/
optimal web design
Designing a website that takes into account the human element requires both an understanding of our nature as well as our physiological limitations. Usable websites incorporate human tendencies and limitation into its overall design. The questions below are meant to address some of the more important human factors concerns in the design and building of usable websites.
http://psychology.wichita.edu/optimalweb//a>
Designing a website that takes into account the human element requires both an understanding of our nature as well as our physiological limitations. Usable websites incorporate human tendencies and limitation into its overall design. The questions below are meant to address some of the more important human factors concerns in the design and building of usable websites.
http://psychology.wichita.edu/optimalweb//a>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)